000			01753naa a2200181uu 4500
001			9092914373537
003			OSt
005			20190211165611.0
008			090929s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aPOULSEN, Birgitte _937881
245	1	0	_aCompeting traditions of governance and dilemmas of administrative accountability : _bthe case of denmark
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell, _cMarch 2009
520	3		_aThis article offers a study of the changing role of the state in Denmark under the condition of the overall transformation from government to governance with particular emphasis on the corresponding transition from process accountability to performance accountability. It is argued that although new modes of governance have been introduced, and new interpretations of accountability have been proliferated, neither conventional modes of governance nor older interpretations of accountability disappear. Thus, what we see is a co-existence of competing traditions of governance and different and sometimes contradictory interpretations of administrative accountability, which create potential dilemmas and contradictions for the individual civil servant. Employing an interpretative approach to governance and public administration, the article analyses the constitution of competing traditions of governance and interpretations of accountability, and the way in which these competing traditions and interpretations lead to accountability dilemmas for the individual civil servant.
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g87, 1, p. 117-131 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell, March 2009 _xISSN 00333298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090929 _b1437^b _cDaiane
998			_a20091009 _b1348^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c30201 _d30201
041			_aeng