000 | 01735naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9101316173037 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211165719.0 | ||
008 | 091013s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHASSEL, Anke _938042 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aThe evolution of a global labor governance regime |
260 |
_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell, _cApril 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aDuring the last decade, the approach by businesses and governments toward labor and social issues at the global level has fundamentally changed. Industrial relations are rapidly internationalizing by developing new actors and forms of governance to deal with the regulation of labor. This article looks at the evolution of self-regulatory standards in the global labor governance debate. Key is that notwithstanding problems with the lacking legal framework of global regulation and enforceability, patterns of local self-regulation, norm-setting, and international codes lead not only to higher expectations of the behavior of transnationally operating firms but also to an indirect pattern of regulation. The article argues that particularly the adoption of the core labor standards by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the setup of the Global Compact by the UN serve as points of convergence. A plethora of voluntarist initiatives that converge over time toward a shared understanding of labor standards is part of the transformation of global labor governance institutions. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g21, 2, p. 231-251 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell, April 2008 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20091013 _b1617^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20091021 _b1459^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c30380 _d30380 |
||
041 | _aeng |