000 | 01803naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9111317473637 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211165854.0 | ||
008 | 091113s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aENDERLEIN, Henrik _938325 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEMU's teenage challenge : _bwhat have we learned and can we predict from political science? |
260 |
_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cJune 2009 |
||
520 | 3 | _aWe review the initial predictions and claims regarding economic and monetary union (EMU) in europe against the evidence of its first ten years of existence. We argue that pessimistic views on the creation of EMU have proved to be wrong. Yet EMU's success is rather puzzling, since it is based on a peculiar institutional structure not thought to lead to success. EMU has generated redistributive effects and may have increased business-cycle synchronization. Those effects have not translated into the expected decrease of legitimacy or a widespread democratic deficit of EMU. At the institutional level, EMU has coped well with an asymmetric framework, largely decoupling EMU from political union. There have been neither major spill-over effects pusshing for further political integration nor conflict and disintegration. The main question for the future is whether this institutional structure will stay the same in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. | |
590 | _aEconomic and monetary integration; Economic and monetary union; Economic governance; EU politics; Fiscal policy; Monetary policy; Political integration | ||
700 | 1 |
_aVERDUN, Amy _910969 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of European Public Policy _g16, 4, p. 490-507 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, June 2009 _xISSN 13501763 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20091113 _b1747^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20091117 _b1614^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c30879 _d30879 |
||
041 | _aeng |