000			01672naa a2200193uu 4500
001			9112316442337
003			OSt
005			20190211165902.0
008			091123s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBÉLAND, Daniel _9982
245	1	0	_aIdeas, institutions, and policy change
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cAugust 2009
520	3		_aSeeking to amend historical institutionalism, this article draws on the political science literature on ideas and the sociological literature on framing to discuss three ways in which ideational processes impact policy change. First, such processes help to construct the problems and issues that enter the policy agenda. Second, ideational processes shape the assumptions that affect the content of reform proposals. Third, these processes can become discursive weapons that participate in the construction of reform imperatives. Overall, ideational processes impact the ways policy actors perceived their interests and the environmental in which they mobilize. Yet, such processes are not the only catalyst of policy change. This claim is further articulated in the final section, which shows how national institutions and repertoires remain central to the politics of policy change despite the undeniable role of transnational actors and process, which interact with such institutions and repertoires.
590			_adiscourse; ideas; institutions; interests; policy; politics
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g16, 5, p. 701-718 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, August 2009 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20091123 _b1644^b _cDaiane
998			_a20091126 _b1143^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c31010 _d31010
041			_aeng