000			01659naa a2200193uu 4500
001			9112317212437
003			OSt
005			20190211165905.0
008			091123s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aÖRNBERG, Jenny Cisneros _938376
245	1	0	_aEscaping deadlock - alcohol policy-making in the EU
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cAugust 2009
520	3		_aDespite the cultural and ideological diversity of the member states when it comes to alcohol, several alcohol-related initiatives have been taken recently at the EU level. The purpose of this article is to analyse the development of two of these initiatives: the Council Recommendation of 5 June 2001 on the drinking of alcohol by young people, and the invitation from the Council to the Commission to develop a Community Alcohol Strategy, both adopted during the Swedish Presidency in 2001. Drawing from Héritier's work on escaping deadlock it is argued that EU decisions on alcohol policy were made possible by using four strategies: priority, anchorage, lowest common denominator and baby steps. In cases of weak EU supranational competence the possibilities of escaping deadlock differ somewhat from cases of strong legislative competence and the strategies of priority and anchorage seem to be of particular importance for question based on soft law decision-making.
590			_aalcohol policy; EU; policy-making; pulic health; Sweden
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g16, 5, p. 755-773 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, August 2009 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20091123 _b1721^b _cDaiane
998			_a20091126 _b1144^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c31014 _d31014
041			_aeng