000 | 01843naa a2200229uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9121810063537 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211170128.0 | ||
008 | 091218s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aGRREN-PEDERSEN, Christoffer _938545 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe institutionalization of environmental attention in the United States and Denmark : _bmultiple versus single-venue systems |
260 |
_aHoboken : _bWiley Periodicals, _cOctober 2009 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe European countries have surpassed the United States with regard to comprehensive and stringent environmental regulation. This policy pattern has become very visible in the international debate about reduction of CO2 emissions. From a comparative public policy perspective, the recent difference is interesting because it restates the question about policy consequences of political institutions. This article addresses this theoretical question from the perspective of policy agenda-setting theory. We present the argument that while the U.S. political system, with its many "venues" that are relatively open to internal and external competing forces, might be quicker in generating attention to new issues like the environment, the institutionalization of attention is also less strong than in a European parliamentary system. The article substantiates this argument with empirics by comparing attention to and policymaking for environmental issues in the United States to Denmark. | |
590 | _aVolume 22 | ||
590 | _aNumber 4 | ||
590 | _aOctober 2009 | ||
700 | 1 |
_aWOLFE, Michelle _938546 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions _g22, 4, p. 625-646 _dHoboken : Wiley Periodicals, October 2009 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20091218 _b1006^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100217 _b1539^b _cDaiane |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c31291 _d31291 |
||
041 | _aeng |