000			01919naa a2200193uu 4500
001			9122215283837
003			OSt
005			20190211170139.0
008			091222s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSCHOUT, Adriaan _924176
245	1	0	_aOrganizational learning in the EU's multi-level governance system
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cDecember 2009
520	3		_aThe Eurpean Union's (EU's) governance reform does not match the expectations of its promoters; the 'new' instruments seem to under-perform. Once explanation, explored here, is that governance has been discussed without much attention to capacities at operating levels. Analysis are needed of how instruments are used and designed within the EU's multi-level administrtive system. To move from governance to capacities, three interrelated levels of learning are distinguished to examine whether changes in governance are supported by developments in organizational capacities: 'governance learning', 'instrument learning' and 'organizational learning'. One hypothesis is that these need to develop simultaneously. The second hypothesis is that, in EU's multi-level administration, learning along these dimensions has to take place in parallel at EU and national levels. This article analyses the capacities which the Commission and the Netherlands have created to support the better regulation agenda. It concludes that there is a much between the three levels of learning in the Commission but a mismatch between learning in the Commission and the Netherlands.
590			_abetter regulation; EU govenance; implementation; instrument learning; organizational learning; paradgmatic learning.
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g16, 8, p. 1124-1144 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, December 2009 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20091222 _b1528^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100119 _b1618^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c31308 _d31308
041			_aeng