| 000 | 01464naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0032210231537 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20240613143319.0 | ||
| 008 | 100322s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_933029 _aVerhoest, Koen |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aJanus-faced reorganization : _bspecialization and coordination in four OECD countries in the period 19802005 |
| 260 |
_aLondon : _bSage Publications, _cSeptember 2007 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aIt is believed that the New Public Management (NPM) doctrine resulted in a disaggregation and a suboptimal fragmentation of government in the 1980s and 1990s, which called for a re-strengthening of the coordination capacity through renewed hierarchy-type mechanisms, market-type mechanisms and network-type mechanisms. In order to assess the validity of this assumption, this article identifies the trajectory of specialization and coordination in four countries (New Zealand, United Kingdom, Sweden, France). The results support the assumption, although different trajectories are discernible. Also, the results point to the renewed emphasis on coordination based on hierarchy, along with markets and networks. | |
| 700 | 1 |
_91346 _a Bouckaert, Geert |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_913710 _aPeters, B. Guy |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g73, 3, p. 325-348 _dLondon : Sage Publications, September 2007 _xISSN 00208523 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20100322 _b1023^b _cDaiane |
||
| 998 |
_a20100323 _b1015^b _cCarolina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c31997 _d31997 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||