000			01416naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0032511321037
003			OSt
005			20190211170717.0
008			100325s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKAO, Chih-Kuei _939257
245	1	0	_aComparison of windows-based delay analysis methods
260			_aExeter, UK : _bElsevier, _cMay 2009
520	3		_aSchedule delays often occur in construction projects and result a controversial issue in assessing their impact on total duration. Windows-based delay analysis methods are the most accurate among various analysis methods for identifying and measuring construction schedule delays. These methods are homologous, but are suitable for different delay situations. This study compares four windows-based delay analysis methods to identify their advantages and limitations. The differences in terms of the perspectives of use prerequisite, functional capability, analytical process and accuracy of analysis results are discussed in terms of a simulated case. Study results are helpful for delay analysts in selecting a suitable method among different windows-based delay analysis methods.
700	1		_aYANG, Jyh-Bin _939258
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Project Management _g27, 4, p. 408-418 _dExeter, UK : Elsevier, May 2009 _xISSN 02637863 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100325 _b1132^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100326 _b1105^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32131 _d32131
041			_aeng