000			01934naa a2200205uu 4500
001			0032512245537
003			OSt
005			20190211170727.0
008			100325s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aAHLEMANN, Frederik _937742
245	1	0	_aProject management standards – Diffusion and application in Germany and Switzerland
260			_aExeter, UK : _bElsevier, _cApril 2009
520	3		_aThis paper comprises the results of an empirical study on the use of project management standards in German and Swiss enterprises. This research points out the expectations, the realized benefits and – more importantly – the major differences between them. For this purpose, it compares ex-ante expectations of their respective users and compares them in turn with ex-post realised benefits. The results of the study are based on the statements made by 234 participants in an online survey conducted in 2006. Generally, standards are only rarely used in project management in Germany and Switzerland. And if standards are indeed used, they are rarely used “as is”; in fact they are usually modified or adapted before application. Moreover, it can be observed that most participants expect consistent communication in the projects and better process quality to be the primary benefits of standards. However, it is often impossible to realize expected benefits. Benefits are offset by deficiencies, such as the lack of acceptance, administrational overheads and associated costs. Based on the results of this study, recommendations for standard-giving organizations and standard-applying organizations are put forward.
700	1		_aTEUTEBERG, Frank _939279
700	1		_aVOGELSANG, Kristin _939280
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Project Management _g27, 3, p. 292-303 _dExeter, UK : Elsevier, April 2009 _xISSN 02637863 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100325 _b1224^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100326 _b1108^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32143 _d32143
041			_aeng