000			01659naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0032610240837
003			OSt
005			20190211170743.0
008			100326s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSARIGIL, Zeki _939298
245	1	0	_aPaths are what actors make of them
260			_aOxon : _bRoutledge, _cApril 2009
520	3		_aSeveral institutionalist orientations such as historical institutionalism, especially its earlier versions, tend to treat institutional or policy change as a result of exogenous factors. Some others, on the other hand, emphasize endogenous sources of change. It has, however, already been shown theoretically and empirically that institutions may face both endogenous and/or exogenous triggers in their lifetime. This study suggests that we should get beyond this fruitless debate and focus on the more intriguing question of why some internal or external triggers create major changes while others do not. This study suggests that some external or internal developments are more likely to trigger change than others because they carry with them certain meanings or ideas for change entrepreneurs. This implies that paying more attention to agency would significantly improve the historical institutionalist account of institutional or policy change. These arguments are illustrated by an analysis of recent institutional changes in the area of cultural rights in Turkey, i.e. in the Kurdish issue.
773	0	8	_tCritical Policy Studies _g3, 1, p. 121-140 _dOxon : Routledge, April 2009 _xISSN 19460171 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100326 _b1024^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100326 _b1503^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32162 _d32162
041			_aeng