000			01691naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0041309501937
003			OSt
005			20190211170850.0
008			100413s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHOPKIN, Jonathan _939385
245	1	0	_a"Grabbing hand" or "helping hand"? : _bcorruption and the economic role of the state
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cApril 2007
520	3		_aThis article seeks to disentangle which features of government intervention are linked to corruption and which are not, by distinguishing between the government roles of regulator, entrepreneur, and consumer. It finds that the degree of regulation of private business activity is the strongest predictor of corruption, and that high levels of public spending are related to low levels of corruption. There is no evidence of direct government involvement in production having any bearing on corruption. It is concluded that advanced welfare capitalist systems, which leave business relatively free from interference while intervening strongly in the distribution of wealth and the provision of key services, combine the most "virtuous" features of "big" and "small" government. This suggests that anti-corruption campaigners should be relaxed about state intervention in the economy in general, but should specifically target corruption-inducing regulatory systems.
700	1		_aRODRÍGUEZ-POSE, Andrés _939386
773	0	8	_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g20, 2, p. 187-208 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, April 2007 _xISSN 09521895 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100413 _b0950^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100414 _b1454^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32306 _d32306
041			_aeng