000 | 01421naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0041513005337 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211170939.0 | ||
008 | 100415s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aKING, Desmond _922384 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe american state and social engineering : _bpolicy instruments in affirmative action |
260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJanuary 2007 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe American state is conventionally depicted as inactive and organizationally weak compared with the state in comparable industrial democracies, and it is sometimes depicted as weak compared with the private sector's capacities to effect change. This interpretation stems from applying an inappropriate Weberian model of stateness. This article examines the way in which measures to implement affirmative have been employed through the policy instruments of quotas to reengineer the divisions between key groups in American society. Placed in historical context, affirmative action illustrates a powerful activism associated with the American state conceived as an institution engaged in setting and monitoring national standards. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g20, 1, p. 109-126 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, January 2007 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100415 _b1300^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100420 _b1358^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32374 _d32374 |
||
041 | _aeng |