000			01556naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0041611061737
003			OSt
005			20190211171007.0
008			100416s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHARRISON, Stephen _939508
245	1	0	_aCo-optation, commodification and the medical model : _bgoverning UK medicine since 1991
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJune 2009
520	3		_aSelf-regulation and autonomy are traditionally treated as distinctive elements of how professions are governed in contrast to other occupations. For medicine, these elements provide a collective medium of governance (through the institutions of professional self-regulation) and an individual medium (through the practice of 'clinical autonomy'). Both are reinforced by the intellectual dominance of the so-called 'biomedical model' of health and illness. Analysts generally agree that, in many countries, both self-regulation and clinical autonomy are under significant challenge. But it is less obvious that, in the UK at least, the biomedical model has effectively been co-opted for managerial purposes to support the commodification of medical care. Thus ideas that have traditionally been considered as supporting medical dominance have transpired to be a source of weakness for the profession.
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration: An International Quarterly _g87, 2, p. 184-197 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, June 2009 _xISSN 00333298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100416 _b1106^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100420 _b1600^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32404 _d32404
041			_aeng