000			01517naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0041611080837
003			OSt
005			20210817121759.0
008			100416s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_913678 _aPollitt, Christopher
245	1	0	_aBureaucracies remember, post-bureaucratic organizations forget?
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJune 2009
520	3		_aThe paper examines the hypothesis that post-bureaucratic forms of organization perform less well than traditional bureaucracies with respect both to organizational memory and learning from experience. First, the paper discusses the meanings of the main terms and concepts to be used in the argument, and delimits its domain. Second, it identifies a series of mechanisms that are likely to bring about memory loss. Third, it examines the empirical literature in search of evidence to confirm or disconfirm the existence and effects of these mechanisms. Fourth, it reflects on its own limitations. Finally, it sets out some broad conclusions concerning the state of organizational memories in the public sector. The aim is to develop new theory, identify relevant generative mechanisms, set this model alongside such evidence as is available, and suggest lines for further research.
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration: An International Quarterly _g87, 2, p. 198-218 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, June 2009 _xISSN 00333298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100416 _b1108^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100420 _b1600^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32405 _d32405
041			_aeng