| 000 | 01637naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0042012112837 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211171113.0 | ||
| 008 | 100420s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aGOLDMANN, Kjell _939584 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAppropriateness and consequences : _bthe logic of neo-institutionalism |
| 260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJanuary 2005 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aSkeptical questions may be raised about the neo-institutionalist approach of James G. March and Johan P. Olsen, in which a "logic of expected consequences" is set against a "logic of appropriateness": (1) it is difficult to determine what kind of constructs the so-called logics arewhether they are to be seen as perspectives, theories, or ideal types; (2) the logics, far from being mutually excluding, overlap very considerably; (3) analytical utility is debatable not only in the case of the "logic of expected consequences" but also when it is a matter of the "logic of appropriateness"; (4) the normative virtue of substituting a "logic of appropriateness" for a "logic of expected consequences" is less obvious than March and Olsen's readers may be led to think. It is tempting to conclude that March and Olsen's approach has proven compelling because of its consequences for the scholarly community rather than by virtue of its analytical appropriateness. | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g18, 1, p. 35-52 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, January 2005 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20100420 _b1211^b _cDaiane |
||
| 998 |
_a20100420 _b1628^b _cCarolina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32502 _d32502 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||