000 | 01353naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0042012395937 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171123.0 | ||
008 | 100420s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aKING, Loren A. _939594 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aDeliberation, legitimacy, and multilateral democracy |
260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJanaury 2003 |
||
520 | 3 | _aIs deliberation essential to legitimate democratic governance? Deliberation may have epistemic value, improving the quality of information and arguments. Deliberation may be transformative, shaping beliefs and opinions. Or deliberation may be part of a conception of justice that constrains authority, by requiring that procedures be justified in terms of reasons acceptable to those burdened by authoritative decisions. Although appealing, the epistemic and transformative arguments are limited by the scale and complexity of many problems for which democratic solutions are sought. But the reason–giving argument is persuasive whenever collective decisions allow burdens to be imposed on others. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g16, 1, p. 23-50 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, Janaury 2003 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100420 _b1239^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100420 _b1400^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32513 _d32513 |
||
041 | _aeng |