000			01628naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0042012433037
003			OSt
005			20190211171126.0
008			100420s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHOWSE, Robert _939595
245	1	0	_aEnhancing WTO legitimacy : _bconstitutionalization or global subsidiarity?
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJanaury 2003
520	3		_aIncreasingly, scholars have articulated the challenge of global economic governance in constitutional terms. The World Trade Organization (WTO) is often painted as an incipient global economic constitution. Its legitimacy would be enhanced, some contend, by transforming the WTO treaty system into a federal construct. But the application of the language of constitutionalism to the WTO is likely to exacerbate the fears of the "discontents" of globalization that the international institutions of economic governance are not democratically accountable to anyone. We argue that the legitimacy of the multilateral trading order requires greater democratic contestability. The notion of global subsidiarity would be a more appropriate model for the WTO than that of a "federal" constitution. This notion incorporates three basic principles: institutional sensitivity, political inclusiveness, and top–down empowerment.
700	1		_aNICOLAIDIS, Kalypso _97735
773	0	8	_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g16, 1, p. 73-94 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, Janaury 2003 _xISSN 09521895 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100420 _b1243^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100420 _b1400^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32515 _d32515
041			_aeng