000			01878naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0042614265537
003			OSt
005			20190211171209.0
008			100426s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLEIBLEIN, Michael J. _939662
245	1	0	_aUnbundling competitive heterogeneity : _bincentive structures and capability influences on technological innovation
260			_aBognor Regis : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJuly 2009
520	3		_aMany studies argue that the continual creation of new ideas by small and young firms steadily destroys the competitive positions of their larger, more established rivals. Despite this attention, empirical results relating firm size to innovation remain exceedingly fragile. This study proposes three reasons for the empirical inconsistencies in the literature: that small and large firms differ in their: (1) stock of technological experiences, (2) use of own- and partner-firm experiences, and (3) abilities to translate own- and partner-firm experiences into innovation activity. Results from a 10-year study of 463 semiconductor firms demonstrate that the mixed findings generated from prior work are partially attributed to these three general propositions. In particular, resource flows, in the form of operating experience developed internally and accessed through codevelopment partners, positively affect innovation activity; but these benefits diminish as a firm increases in size. The findings broadly support the notion that differences in the incentives and abilities of small and large firms give rise to heterogeneity in the firms' innovation activity.
700	1		_aMADSEN, Tammy L. _96461
773	0	8	_tStrategic Management Journal _g30, 7, p. 711-735 _dBognor Regis : Wiley-Blackwell, July 2009 _xISSN 01432095 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100426 _b1426^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100428 _b1659^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32583 _d32583
041			_aeng