000			01510naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0042712224737
003			OSt
005			20190211171258.0
008			100427s2001 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHUNOLD, Christian _939730
245	1	0	_aCorporatism, pluralism and democracy : _btoward a deliberative theory of bureaucracy accountability
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cApril 2001
520	3		_aThis essay proposes a deliberative model of bureaucratic accountability and assesses its feasibility. Conventional wisdom suggests that a deliberative theory of bureaucratic accountability has little utility outside corporatist contexts. I reject this view because recent changes in patterns of interest representation have transformed both corporatist and pluralist bureaucracies into more hospitable environments for public deliberation. Contrary to the claims of democratic corporatists, recent pluralist practices of interest representation also seem to be compatible with public deliberation. Hence, movement toward greater openness in administrative decision-making is possible from both liberal pluralist and corporatist starting points. Corporatism clearly has no monopoly on democratic deliberation.
773	0	8	_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g14, 2, p. 151-167 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, April 2001 _xISSN 09521895 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100427 _b1222^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100428 _b1638^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32652 _d32652
041			_aeng