000			01754naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0043010021637
003			OSt
005			20190211171323.0
008			100430s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLOWERY, David _96297
245	1	0	_aAnswering the public choice challenge : _ba neoprogressive research agenda
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJanuary 1999
520	3		_aA neoprogressive research agenda is developed to challenge public choice theory's position as the new orthodoxy in both understanding and guiding policy choices about urban service delivery. Such a challenge requires more than accumulating negative empirical tests. Rather, we must accept the new burden of proof laid on proponents of progressive reform institutions by the theories of nonmarket failure and quasimarkets, ideas that undermined the intellectual pillars supporting progressive reform institutions and can only be challenged by new ideas. Public choice theory itself, broadly considered, is proposed as a valid source of such new ideas. Three research programs, in part already underway, are outlined as essential building blocks in the research agenda, focusing, respectively, on blunting the rough edges of the theory of nonmarket failure, coordinating the empirical critiques of quasimarkets in a new theory of quasimarket failure, and developing the new institutionalism so that it can provide the basis for comparing the production outcomes of alternative urban institutions.
773	0	8	_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration _g12, 1, p. 29-56 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, January 1999 _xISSN 09521895 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100430 _b1002^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100506 _b0844^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32711 _d32711
041			_aeng