000			01697naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0043012540437
003			OSt
005			20190211171346.0
008			100430s1997 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aDAUGBJERG, Carsten _938316
245	1	0	_aPolicy networks and agricultural policy reforms : _bexplaining deregulation in Sweden and re-regulation in the european community
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cApril 1997
520	3		_aPolicy network analysis has been criticized for being unable to explain outcomes and change in outcomes. This article develops a theoretical network model which attempts to explain reform outcomes. It suggests that the success of reformers depends mainly on the policy network type existing in the sector in which they attempt to bring about change. If the network has a high degree of cohesion, then those network members who are subject to reform have power to defend the principles of the established policy. Consequently, only moderate policy reform occurs. On the other hand, if the network's degree of cohesion is low, then those who are subject to reform do not have the power to oppose reformers successfully. Therefore, reformers have opportunities to bring about fundamental policy reform. Differences in the cohesion of agricultural policy networks help to explain why the 1990 Swedish agricultural policy reform was more radical than the European Community's in 1992.
773	0	8	_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration _g10, 2, p. 123-141 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, April 1997 _xISSN 09521895 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100430 _b1254^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100505 _b1713^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32740 _d32740
041			_aeng