000 | 01326naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0050310564837 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171355.0 | ||
008 | 100503s1997 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aTURNER, Royce _939786 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe complexities of political agenda determination : _bthe case of the british coal industry |
260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cOctober 1997 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe coal industry has provided for huge controversy since the 1970s. Much of it has focused on contraction and attempts to stop that. This article examines the efforts of two pressure groups—the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) and the Coalfield Communities Campaign (CCC)—seeking to manipulate the political agenda in their own favor. It examines why the two groups, though both trying to affect issues on the political agenda to meet aspirations in coalfields, met a different response. It also examines why and how the CCC was able to achieve more success at political agenda manipulation at the European, rather than the national, level. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration _g10, 4, p. 377-395 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, October 1997 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100503 _b1056^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100505 _b1709^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32754 _d32754 |
||
041 | _aeng |