000 | 01988naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0050410170737 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171421.0 | ||
008 | 100504s1995 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMONTRICHER, Nicole de _97388 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCountry report : _bdecentralization in France |
260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJuly 1995 |
||
520 | 3 | _aIn France decentralization of the government was part of the socialist platform for the 1981 presidential election. The issue was immediately put on the agenda by the minister in charge of "interior and decentralization." The law was published on March 2nd 1982. Ten years later, decentralization is considered a decisive reform toward the modernization of the state. Local governments are engaged in the process of learning the politics of autonomy. But the law maintained the prefet. Therefore the institutional pattern establishes two authorities in charge of the same territory at the level of "département" and "région." It could be said that the goal of the 1982 reform was to authorize the expression of a local demand while the equality and qualify of public services would be preserved, thanks to deconcentration of the national apparatus. This scheme implies dramatic changes both in the local political system and in the national bureaucracy. The latest is reluctant to assess the evolution. | |
520 | 3 | _aIn 1994 public administration in France is in transition. Its centralized structure and rationale has offen led to strategies directed toward the conservation of the old habits and privileges. The role of the prefect is still unsettled. Perhaps more important, serious institutional limits have been imposed on the process of change. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration _g8, 3, p. 405-418 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, July 1995 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100504 _b1017^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100505 _b1700^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32794 _d32794 |
||
041 | _aeng |