000 | 01749naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0050410341437 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171427.0 | ||
008 | 100504s1995 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aLAZIN, Fred A. _95934 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aLessons for the study of policy implementation : _bproject renewal in Israel |
260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cApril 1995 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article attempts to clarify some of the issues in the debate over the study of policy implementation, in particular the disagreements between proponents of the top-down versus bottom-up approaches. It proposes use of a modified top-down perspective which bridges the assumed dichotomy between policy formulation, enactment, and an implementation process and addresses many of the concerns of the bottom-up research strategy. This new perspective portrays implementation as part of a single ongoing process in which policy is formulated, enacted and continually readjusted and adapted before and after implementation at the local level. | |
520 | 3 | _aThe article is based on an analysis of the findings of a case study of the implementation of Israel's Project Renewal, a comprehensive community renewal and development program a hybrid resembling the American Urban Renewal, Model Cities and the War on Poverty programs. Rather than evaluate the success of this Israeli program, the intent here is to ask what the research findings teach about the study of policy implementation. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration _g8, 2, p. 261-280 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, April 1995 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100504 _b1034^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100505 _b1658^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c32802 _d32802 |
||
041 | _aeng |