000 02474naa a2200181uu 4500
001 0051310395637
003 OSt
005 20190211171524.0
008 100513s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aKEMMET, Lynndee
_940050
245 1 0 _aLocal fiscal stress in California :
_bout of local control and driving toward growth
260 _aNew York :
_bMarcel Dekker,
_c2003
520 3 _aMany regions of the United States have experienced rapid growth in recent decades with California being the best example of this growth. The dangers of such growth have been evident since the 1970s and yet, neither the state nor local governments have been very successful in implementing growth control policies. Why it is that government has been unable to rein in the growth has been the focus of much research in recent decades. There are essentially two schools of thought with regard to this question. One is that pro-growth forces—essentially landowners, business elites, and elected officials—actively promote growth because it provides them personally with benefits. The other view, advocated most by Paul Peterson back in the early 1980s, is that elected officials do support and adopt pro-growth policies, but not by choice. Cities, Peterson argued, are constrained by the economic situation around them and they must do what they can to raise revenues and reduce, or hold steady, expenditures. This research examines a region of southern California that has experienced tremendous growth despite the fact that surveys of resident attitudes within the region indicates that in general, residents favor growth control. This research contributes to an understanding of the driving forces behind the pro-growth policies of local governments by considering how fiscal constraints placed on local governments by the state may limit the policy options of local elected officials, as Peterson predicted. This study finds that there is evidence to indicate that the revenue-raising options available to cities may be contributing to pro-growth policies. And this could help explain why elected officials continue to support growth within their cities despite the fact that residents express negative views toward growth.
773 0 8 _tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA
_g26, 13, p. 1473-1494
_dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 2003
_xISSN 01900692
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20100513
_b1039^b
_cDaiane
998 _a20100514
_b1139^b
_cCarolina
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c33075
_d33075
041 _aeng