000 | 01620naa a2200229uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0052015292537 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171853.0 | ||
008 | 100520s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aJAJU, S. B. _940375 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTowards managing quality cost : _ba case study |
260 |
_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cset./out. 2009 |
||
520 | 3 | _aOne of the most effective tools for evaluating the success of a quality management programme is the measurement of quality costs (prevention, appraisal and failure costs). The application of the concept of quality costs originated in the early 1950s. A systematic approach is needed for measuring quality costs. This paper describes a case study to capture quality costs in a manufacturing company. An appropriate framework is proposed for capturing quality costs and statistical analysis is carried out to characterise trends and relationships between various components. In this paper, we have demonstrated that quality cost should not be seen as solving a problem with a unique definition, but rather that there exists a whole space of reasonable notions of quality improvements, and that these notions can be seen as actionable guidelines to successfully implement a TQM programme. | |
590 | _aVolume 20 | ||
590 | _aNumbers 9-10 | ||
700 | 1 |
_aMOHANTY, R. P. _940376 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aLAKHE, R. R. _940377 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence _g20, 9-10, p. 1075-1094 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, set./out. 2009 _xISSN 14783363 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100520 _b1529^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100531 _b1325^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33421 _d33421 |
||
041 | _aeng |