000 | 01284naa a2200217uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0052015411837 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171856.0 | ||
008 | 100520s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCHEN, Jih-Kuang _940387 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aA new method to identify the category of the quality attribute |
260 |
_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cset./out. 2009 |
||
520 | 3 | _aSince Kano et al. (1984) proposed the two-dimension quality model, it was widely accepted and applied. Yet there are still arguments raised, especially the identification method of its attribute. Later on some scholars proposed some corrective methods, but there were still some defaults in application. Therefore, the research proposed a new identification method for quality attribute to improve the accuracy of the identification. The method was not only easy to use, but also effective through difference comparison with traditional method by real cases. | |
590 | _aVolume 20 | ||
590 | _aNumbers 9-10 | ||
700 | 1 |
_aLEE, Yu-Cheng _940388 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence _g20, 9-10, p. 1139-1152 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, set./out. 2009 _xISSN 14783363 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100520 _b1541^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100531 _b1326^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33426 _d33426 |
||
041 | _aeng |