000 | 01853naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0052110510123 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171912.0 | ||
008 | 100521s2001 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aREYNOLDS JR, Harry W. _940438 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPublic Administration and policy agendas : _bsome preliminaries to statute law making |
260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c2001 |
||
520 | 3 | _aFederal agencies are important players in the formulation of statutes. As an object of study and as part of the governmental process, academic public administration has shown little interest in the nature and extent of civil servants' involvement in this phenomenon, or in its ramifications. Making use of some data from survey research questionnaires as well as recently published histories of congressional enactments, this article seeks to open the door a little bit on this subject. Preliminary findings suggest that administrators are a significant influence from the earliest stages of statutes' evolution, impacting both important and run-of-the-mine enactments. That influence is evident in the frequency with which many agencies initiate and pursue their own legislative agendas year by year, draft their own bills, and participate in shaping policy objectives arising within Congress and among interest groups. By law, agencies are supposed to clear proposals through OMB before going to Congress, but as we will not, clearance can be a relative thing. Few proposed initiatives emanate directly from the White House. Tax and spending bills were excluded from the study, as were private bills. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g24, 1, p. 31-50 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 2001 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100521 _b1051^b _cCarolina |
||
998 |
_a20100524 _b1423^b _cDaiane |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33458 _d33458 |
||
041 | _aeng |