000 | 01871naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0052412051741 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171920.0 | ||
008 | 100524s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aTHUY, Pham Thu _940453 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aLessons for pro-poor payments for environmental services : _ban analysis of projects in Vietnam |
260 |
_aHong Kong : _bUniversity of Hong Kong, _cDecember 2009 |
||
520 | 3 | _aPayments for environmental services (PES) are seen as a useful economic tool to ensure both environmental health and human welfare. Doubts have been expressed, however, as to whether PES can be pro-poor. Using four PES case studies in Vietnam (one project on carbon sequestration , two projects on landscape beauty and biodiversity conservation, and one project on watershed protection), the article highlights the pitfalls of PES projects and discusses lessons learnt for PES and pro-poor PES approaches. Major pitfalls and lessons for PES an pro-poor PES are: high transaction costs due to complex project administration and conflicts among actors; limited number of ES buyers due to political interference; the need for continuous follow-up activities among potential ES buyers; the need to adopt an approach to PES that is more bottom-up than the current rather top-down approach; and transparent and well monitored mechanisms for the distribution of benefits. The studied projects, although still incipient, have had both positive and negative impacts on the poor. The impacts have been mainly financial. | |
700 | 1 |
_aCAMPBELL, Bruce M _940454 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aGARNETT, Stephen _940455 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration _g31, 2, p. 117-133 _dHong Kong : University of Hong Kong, December 2009 _xISSN 02598272 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100524 _b1205^b _cJaqueline |
||
998 |
_a20100607 _b0938^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33479 _d33479 |
||
041 | _aeng |