000 | 01513naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0052416433737 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211171932.0 | ||
008 | 100524s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aFAULK, Dagney _940474 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aAn examination of selected economic development outcomes from consolidation |
260 |
_aGeorgia : _bCarl Vinson Institute of Government of the University of Georgia, _c2009 |
||
520 | 3 | _aProponents of city-county government consolidation argue that it is likely to have a positive effect on economic development because less bureaucracy and more efficient government will atract new business, encourage the expansion of existing business, and increase local employment. This article examines the effect of city-county consolidation on employment levels and the number of business establishments in Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia; Kansas City-Wyandotte County, Kansas; and Lafayette City-Lafayette Parish, Louisiana. A fixed-effects regression model is used to examine the impact of consolidation. The results suggest that consolidation has no effect on economic development as measured by employment levels and the number of business establishments. | |
700 | 1 |
_aSCHANSBERG, Eric _940475 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tState and Local Government Review _g41, 3, p. 193-200 _dGeorgia : Carl Vinson Institute of Government of the University of Georgia, 2009 _xISSN 0160323X _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100524 _b1643^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100607 _b1001^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33500 _d33500 |
||
041 | _aeng |