000 02449naa a2200193uu 4500
001 0052614191241
003 OSt
005 20190211171951.0
008 100526s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aHIGGINS, Paul
_940537
245 1 0 _aThe thinking styles of human resource practitioners
260 _aBingley, UK :
_bEmerald,
_c2009
520 3 _aPurpose – Drawing upon Sternberg's theory of mental self-government, this paper aims to investigate the thinking styles and workplace experiences of 152 human resource (HR) practitioners pursuing Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) membership. It seeks to explore whether their thinking styles complemented their jobs and consider the implications for the CIPD's notion of the “thinking performer”. Design/methodology/approach – A two-part questionnaire, including the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II (Sternberg et al.) is completed by the research participants to identify their Type I (creativity-generating) and Type II (norm-favouring) thinking styles. Six focus group sessions are also conducted to gather insights about the participants' workplace experiences. Findings – On average, participants scored more highly on Type I thinking styles. Although this suggested their thinking styles are consistent with the “thinking performer” ideal, focus group participants doubted whether the creativity-generating attributes of Type I suited the reality of the HR function, which is described as being awash with rule bound behaviours. Particularly, this is the experience of junior staff, who felt unable to challenge senior management or contribute to the bigger picture. Correlation coefficients revealed that age, length of service with current organization and perceived autonomy at work are the most significant socialisation variables. Practical implications – Emphasis on strategic matters in CIPD courses needs to be balanced with a greater recognition of the operational and routine reality of much HR practice. Originality/value – This represents the first known attempt to test thinking performer construct amongst HR practitioners. The study combines questionnaire and focus group methods.
700 1 _aZHANG, Li-fang
_940538
773 0 8 _tThe Learning Organization
_g16, 4, p. 276-289
_dBingley, UK : Emerald, 2009
_xISSN 09696474
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20100526
_b1419^b
_cJaqueline
998 _a20100607
_b1013^b
_cCarolina
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c33553
_d33553
041 _aeng