| 000 | 02531naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0052717035537 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211172129.0 | ||
| 008 | 100527s1998 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aKHATOR, Renu _940654 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe new paradigm : _bfrom development administration to sustainable development administration |
| 260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1998 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aIn light of changing national and international conditions, the field of public administration is going through an exercise of refounding and reinventing. Globalization, technological advancements, and ecological concerns have diluted the importance of development administration. This study traces the demise of development administration and presents a new paradigm in the form of sustainable development administration. The author argues that the paradigm of sustainable development administration (SDA) is markedly different from the traditional paradigm of development administration (DA) in its emphasis, scope, treatment of politics, view of indigenous cultures, goals, operating mode, decision-making system, use of foreign aid, and performance accountability. The study concludes by declaring that SDA has the potential to emerge as a new field of study in public administration. | |
| 520 | 3 | _aThe discipline of public administration is at a crossroads: the advent of the global village philosophy is challenging its parochial tendencies(1);the refounding of public administration is nullifying its separation from politics(2); and the reinvention of government is questioning the very basic reasons for its existence.(3) Faced with new and continuing intellectual challenges, the discipline is in search of a new paradigm.(4) What will this new paradigm be? What will its emphases and priorities be? The answers are less than clear at this point, however, the questions themselves are receiving attention from scholars. This article attempts to examine one of many alleged elements of the emerging paradigm, and that is the shift from development to sustainable development. The arguments presented here trace the demise of development focus in public administration and explore the possibility of sustainable development becoming the new thrust. | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g21, 12, p. 1777-1801 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1998 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20100527 _b1703^b _cDaiane |
||
| 998 |
_a20100531 _b1611^b _cCarolina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33663 _d33663 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||