000			01581naa a2200205uu 4500
001			0052811112037
003			OSt
005			20190211172215.0
008			100528s1998 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aROBERTS, Alasdair _916575
245	1	0	_aThe unassailable principle : _bwhy luther gulick searched for a science of administration
260			_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1998
520	3		_aLuther Gulick's two contributions to the Papers on the Science of Administration are often regarded as a statement of the “orthodoxy” in the field of public administration in the pre-war period. This paper challenges this view. It argues that the two basic claims in Gulick's work--the notion that public administration could be considered as a science, and that field could be studied without regard to politics--were widely contested throughout the 1920's and 1930's. Gulick adhered to these claims in part because they were useful in protecting a young and weakly-institutionalized field against powerful critics. By the late 1930's, academics in public administration may have confronted a dilemma: the position staked out by Gulick and others, while essential to the development of the field, was regarded by many within the field as being intellectually untenable.
590			_aVolume 21
590			_aNumbers 2-4
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g21, 2-4, p. 235-274 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1998 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100528 _b1111^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100531 _b1621^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33732 _d33732
041			_aeng