| 000 | 03698naa a2200265uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0053110434237 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211172237.0 | ||
| 008 | 100531s1997 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aRADIN, Beryl _940736 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFrom public action to public administration : _bwhere does it lead? |
| 260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1997 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aMinnowbrook I and Minnowbrook II differ in one important way. Minnowbrook I involved mostly scholars who came to the field primarily through formal academic training. Several of those who participated in Minnowbrook II are products of comrnunity-based applied revisions of so-called new public administration in the 1960s. Radin served as a union employee and then a staff member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Cooper worked as a minister at several inner-city churches. Both Radin and Cooper took their doctorates later in their careers, after extensive street level experience. From this perspective they focus on the unique political setting of public administration, on the field's publicness, on the salience of theories of change, on a process perspective, and on soft research methodologies. | |
| 520 | 3 | _aThrough much of its history, the field of public administration in the United States has been punctuated by figures who moved from the arena of action to opportunities for reflection, either through writing or teaching or both. A review of the literature of the field up to the 1960s provides strong evidence of this pattern and is particularly illustrated by two important eras of public administrationthe municipal reform period and the post-New Deal period.(1) The decade of he 1960s was one of the few periods of the twentieth century in which action was not the predominant pathway to concern about administrative issues. In contrast to this earlier pattern, the generation of public administration academics in the 1960s focused on writing and teaching as a goal unto itself, rather than as a way of searching for the meaning of action in which one was previously engaged. | |
| 520 | 3 | _aIndeed, the original group of participants in the Minnowbrook conference came to the field of public administration through formal academic training; their quest for values, relevancy, and meaning developed as they looked out of the windows of the academy to the turbulent society of which they were a part.(2) | |
| 520 | 3 | _aWhile some were on the inside looking out during the 1960s, others were attempting to define meaning and relevancy within the world of action rather than the world of the academy. This paper is an attempt to explore the influence of that action experience on the public administration field. The authors of this paper spent the 1960s engaged in a part of the social action that spawned the new public administration movement. | |
| 520 | 3 | _aWe believe that our involvements in the 1960s led to the development of perspectives on public administration which are somewhat different from those of individuals who were primarily involved in academe during those turbulent times. This paper begins with a short autobiographical account which provides the personal context for our perspectives. It then contrasts our views with those of the Minnowbrook group and focuses on those elements that make up our perspective on the field. | |
| 590 | _aVolume 20 | ||
| 590 | _aNumbers 4-5 | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aCOOPER, Terry _940737 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g20, 4-5, p. 909-934 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1997 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20100531 _b1043^b _cDaiane |
||
| 998 |
_a20100531 _b1604^b _cCarolina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33773 _d33773 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||