000 | 01804naa a2200229uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0060214221337 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211172334.0 | ||
008 | 100602s1997 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCORNELIUS, James C. _940812 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aEvaluating impacts for competing land use alternatives |
260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1997 |
||
520 | 3 | _aPublic sector decisions concerning land use can benefit from a consistent accounting of economic values represented in alternative uses. While conventional economic valuation may not represent all interests bearing on optimal land use, ignorance or misuse of economic principles in the decision process may lead to socially undesirable outcomes. We make use of an impact assessment technique based on the U.S. Forest Service Micro IMPLAN model to compile and measure the economic consequences of alternative agricultural land use. This approach provides consistent measurement of economic impacts based on quantified linkages among the different sectors represented in Hood River County, Oregon. An orchard and a golf course are compared in terms of the magnitude and distribution of direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts arising from alternative uses of a designated land parcel. While the results are not generalizable to specific applications, the approach highlights the key economic variables that generate economic benefits in alternative uses. | |
590 | _aVolume 20 | ||
590 | _aNumbers 8-9 | ||
700 | 1 |
_aJENSEN, William _940813 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSEAVERT, Clark F. _940814 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g20, 8-9, p. 1619-1643 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1997 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100602 _b1422^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100604 _b1526^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33893 _d33893 |
||
041 | _aeng |