000 | 01578naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0060215444437 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211172353.0 | ||
008 | 100602s1997 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHARRIS, Michael _94630 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPolicy termination : _buncovering the ideological dimension |
260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1997 |
||
520 | 3 | _adeLeon and others assert that progress in policy termination research requires an emphasis on political-ideological reasons for termination. One obstacle to pursuing this line of inquiry is that cases of successful policy termination are relatively rare. As a useful alternative, one could examine cases in which ideology has apparently prevented a strongly indicated policy termination. An example is the Israeli Labor government's decision to bail out Israel's failing kibbutzim (collectives) despite severe budget pressures and the near-certainty that some kibbutzim will still not become self-supporting. Labor will not terminate its policy of support because, although the kibbutzim's direct political power is diminished, they retain substantial moral authority as past nation- builders and as embodiments of Labor's socialist/humanist ideals. Anomalous non-terminations such as this should offer rich possibilities for policy termination research. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g20, 12, p. 2151-2175 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1997 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100602 _b1544^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100604 _b1531^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33917 _d33917 |
||
041 | _aeng |