000			01542naa a2200205uu 4500
001			0060216302337
003			OSt
005			20190211172409.0
008			100602s1996 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aTAYLOR, John _931272
245	1	0	_aEthical implications of the new managerialism : _bconflicting loyalties: normative pluralism in modern public administration one australian perspective
260			_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1996
520	3		_aAs public resources are not unlimited, choices have to be made between various community goals and the extent of their fulfilment. There is no necessary conflict between managing and attempting to allocate public resources amongst competing and sometimes conflicting goals in a more efficient, effective, economic and accountable manner on the one hand and contributing to society's overall wider goals on the other. Attention is drawn, however, to the need to deal in a balanced way with the requirements of equity, probity, fairness, impartiality, ethical considerations, public accountability, the public interest, and the exercise of public trust as well as, for example, deficiencies in data. A sound ethical basis is essential for workable and good administration.
590			_aVolume 19
590			_aNumbers 11-12
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g19, 11-12, p. 2213-2233 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1996 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100602 _b1630^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100604 _b1519^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33935 _d33935
041			_aeng