000			02068naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0060409323737
003			OSt
005			20190211172425.0
008			100604s1996 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMAJONE, Giandomenico _96519
245	1	0	_aRegulation and its modes : _bthe European experience
260			_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1996
520	3		_aThere is a general trend in Europe, both at the national and Community level, toward greater specialization and institutionalization of regulatory functions. This essay presents three different but related sets of reasons that help to explain the rise of the regulatory state in Europe, and even why regulation seems to be becoming the new frontier of public policy and administration. A first set of reasons has to do with the failure of nationalization as a mode of regulation and the process of privatization, which have led to new regulatory bodies. The second set of factors, related to the increasing complexity and internationalization of the tasks facing policy makers, has led to new or stronger regulatory bodies at the Community level. The third set has to do with the role of the European Community as an independent “fourth branch of government” for the European nations. This latter trend has some problems, as the lack of transparency of the decision-making process. However, this problem can be solved. Moreover, the explanations for the rise of independent regulatory agencies echo many characteristic themes of the politics of efficiency, being recently rediscovered. The conviction that policy should be right, rather than the result of group struggle, leads to demands that policymakers should combine technical expertise and public deliberation to achive decisions that are substantively correct and politically legitimated.
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g19, 9, p. 1597-1637 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1996 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100604 _b0932^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100604 _b1514^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c33963 _d33963
041			_aeng