000			01646naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0060810483537
003			OSt
005			20190211172548.0
008			100608s1995 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aRICE, Mitchell F. _940612
245	1	0	_aState and local government set-aside programs and minority business development in the post-croson era : _bthe efficacy of disparity studies
260			_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1995
520	3		_aSince the Supreme Court's decision in City I of Richmond v. J. A. Croson in early 1989, disparity studies or minority business studies or discrimination studies have become a focal point in state and local government jurisdictions' Minority Business Enterprise set-aside policies. Disparity studies have been conducted in more than sixty jurisdictions around the United States. This article discusses (1) the status of MBE set-aside programs after Croson, (2) examines the efficacy of disparity studies as mechanisms for justifying the adoption or continuation of set-aside programs in state and local governmental jurisdictions, (3) provides discussion of specific procedural analyses which have been major components of a disparity study and (4) provides a summary discussion of disparity studies conducted in five jurisdictions. The conclusion notes several weaknesses of disparity studies that, if addressed, would enhance their utilty.
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g18, 7, p. 1011-1064 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1995 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100608 _b1048^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100616 _b1029^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34126 _d34126
041			_aeng