000			01433naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0060810512937
003			OSt
005			20190211172549.0
008			100608s1995 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aGOODMAN, Marshall R. _940974
245	1	0	_aThe changing nature of urban affirmative action programs : _bthe search for race-netral alternatives
260			_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1995
520	3		_aIn January, 1989, the U.S. Supreme Court cast in doubt the legality of minority set-aside programs. The Court required government set-aside programs to meet a “strict-scrutiny” standard of review and required cities to first explore race-neutral means for increasing minority firm participation prior to utilizing any type of rigid quota system. This paper examines how four cities have reacted quite differently, with some cities continuing old practices, and others developing a mixture of new policies and implementation structures. It is argued that the Supreme Court's decision will have only a minor impact on minority contracting programs, with cities seeking to combine affirmative action contracting programs with those that stress economic development.
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g18, 7, p. 1065-1097 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1995 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100608 _b1051^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100616 _b1041^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34127 _d34127
041			_aeng