000 | 01192naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0060914572337 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211172643.0 | ||
008 | 100609s1987 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSNAVELY, Keith _917765 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPositive attributes of state direct order mandates : _ba case study of planning mandates in California |
260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1987 |
||
520 | 3 | _aStates closely regulate the policies of their local units of government through the imposition of direct order mandates. The general literature on state as well as federal mandate activities suggests that such regulations seriously constrain local autonomy and add to local financial burdens. A case study of the application of California's planning mandates in a sample of small nonmetropolitan cities suggests that major programmatic mandates are not always restrictive; mandates can be beneficial by empowering local officials. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g9, 2, p. 127-151 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1987 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100609 _b1457^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100616 _b1023^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34220 _d34220 |
||
041 | _aeng |