000			01758naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0060915154637
003			OSt
005			20190211172650.0
008			100609s1989 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKASS, Henry D. _941070
245	1	0	_aEthics and public administration : _bcritique and reconstruction
260			_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1989
520	3		_aIn the post-Watergate era, many observers saw the renewed interest in administrative ethics as a passing fad. Now, over a decade later, the continued interest in this area belies this judgment. Indeed, this increased concern with administrative ethics is rooted in the realization that administration is as much an ethica, as technical pursuit. One cannot read John Rohr's "Ethics in Public Administration: A State of the Discipline Report," delivered at the 1986 ASPA Conference, without receiving the distinct impression that administrative ethics is an area of practice and study that is experiencing a profound upheaval. Views are diverse and often inchoate. Assumptions behind ethical prescr- ptions are still frequently unstated and unexamined. In addition, we still continue to seek techniques that will ensure administrative ethicality without understanding the nature of the ethical problems confronted in public administration and the reasons they are confronted. In short, there exists a need for theoretical clarification and classification in the area of ethics and public administration
700	1		_aZINKE, Robert C. _940671
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g12, 6, p. 835-839 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1989 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100609 _b1515^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100615 _b1210^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34228 _d34228
041			_aeng