000 | 01619naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0060915291737 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211172656.0 | ||
008 | 100609s1989 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aFISCHER, David W. _941076 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aThe coastal zone as an administrative entity for governing U.S. marine minerals development |
260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1989 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe coastal zone is being promoted as a spatial unit to coordinate and administer offshore minerals development with other coastal uses. Rather than aiding the administration of minerals development , the coastal zone is being used as the reason to block such development. This paper explores the coastal zone concept as an entity for administration. It concludes that just because minerals may be found in a coastal zone does not mean that physical entity is the most appropriate vehicle for administering mineral development. Arbitrariness at to what is included or excluded from a coastal zone as well as many minerals impacts being found outside of the coastal zone militate against such an entity being the sole criterion for decisionmaking. While the coastal zone may be appropriate for some mineral decisions, the choice to implement it must be arrayed against alternative criteria to ensure a high degree of effectiveness and efficiency in those decisions | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g12, 5, p. 707-729 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1989 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100609 _b1529^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100615 _b1211^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34236 _d34236 |
||
041 | _aeng |