000			01849naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0061013010337
003			OSt
005			20190211172729.0
008			100610s1988 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLOONEY, Robert E. _941103
245	1	0	_aBudgetary impacts of third world arms production
260			_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c1988
520	3		_aOne of the more intriguing empirical findings in recent years is evidence that a number of Third World economies experience a positive relationship between military expenditures and overall rates of economic growth. While this result has been found in a number of individual studies, no satisfactory explanation has been put forth - presumably defense expenditures have both positive spin-offs, tending to support growth, and a number of negative aspects such a crowding out of private sector investment which tend to reduce overall growth. It is something of a tautology therefore to argue that those countries experiencing net positive benefits from defense expenditure simply have an environment where the net positive effects predominate. The purpose of this paper is to show that Third World arms producers differ considerably in terms of budgetary priorities from their non producer counterparts. More importantly it can be demonstrated that differences in budgetary priorities between these two groups of countries is consistent with the fact that arms producers tend to obtain net positive benefits from military expenditures while non-producers find their overall rates of growth declining with increased allocations to defense
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g11, 5, p. 601-621 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 1988 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100610 _b1301^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100615 _b1204^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34283 _d34283
041			_aeng