000			01710naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0061810462637
003			OSt
005			20190211172828.0
008			100618s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aWAGNER, Wolfgang _915001
245	1	0	_aGuarding the guards. The European Convention and the communitization of police co-operation
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cDecember 2006
520	3		_aOne of the core principles of the liberal constitutional state, namely that the police must be subject to efficient parliamentary and judicial control, has been challenged by the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol). As with justice and home affairs co-operation more generally, Europol has deliberately been kept at arm's length from any supranational control by the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice. Critics were particularly concerned about the envisioned assignment of operational powers to Europol which aggravate the gap between policing powers and the ineffectiveness of their control. After two intergovernmental conferences had failed to establish effective parliamentary and judicial control over Europol, the Constitutional Convention agreed to abolish the pillar structure and, as a consequence, subject Europol to supranational control. This paper analyses the arguments put forward in favour of constitutionalization and the conditions that contributed to successful constitutionalization in the convention.
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g13, 8, p. 1230-1246 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, December 2006 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100618 _b1046^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100623 _b1746^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34409 _d34409
041			_aeng