000			01714naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0061811043237
003			OSt
005			20190211172832.0
008			100618s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSHAFFER, Gregory _941184
245	1	0	_aWhat's new in EU trade dispute settlement? Judicialization, public-private networks and the WTO legal order
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cSeptember 2006
520	3		_aThere is a recursive relationship between the judicialization of international trade relations and the development of public-private partnerships in the EU to address international trade claims. The more legalized international trading system creates stronger incentives for well-placed private actors to engage public legal processes. At the same time, to litigate effectively in the WTO system, government officials need the specific information that businesses and their legal representatives can provide. Officials therefore strive to establish better working relations with industry on trade matters. As a result, the EU's decision-making process for the investigation, litigation and settlement of trade claims has become a dynamic, ad hoc, hybrid, multi-tiered process in which private interests are deeply implicated. The process is neither purely intergovernmental nor purely private, but rather involves public-private networks operating in the shadow of international trade law. The process changes and adapts through trial and error.
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g13, 6, p. 832-850 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, September 2006 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100618 _b1104^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100623 _b1747^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34416 _d34416
041			_aeng