000			01711naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0061813344937
003			OSt
005			20190211172847.0
008			100618s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aALTER, Karen J. _941199
245	1	0	_aNested and overlapping regimes in the transatlantic banana trade dispute
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cApril 2006
520	3		_aThe decade-long transatlantic banana dispute was not a traditional trade conflict stemming from antagonistic producers' interests. Instead, this article argues that the banana dispute is one of the most complex illustrations of the legal and political difficulties created by the nesting and overlapping of international institutions and commitments. The contested Europe-wide banana policy was an artifact of nesting - the fruit of efforts to reconcile the single market with Lomé obligations which then ran afoul of WTO rules. Using counter-factual analysis, this article explores how the nesting of international commitments contributed to creating the dispute, provide forum shopping opportunities which themselves complicated the options of decision-makers, and hindered resolution of what would otherwise be a pretty straightforward trade dispute. We then draw out implications from this case for the EU, an institutions increasingly nested within multilateral mechanisms, and for the issue of the nesting of international institutions in general.
700	1		_aMEUNIER, Sophie _941200
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g13, 3, p. 362-382 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, April 2006 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100618 _b1334^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100623 _b1740^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34436 _d34436
041			_aeng