| 000 | 01730naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0062111214137 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211172927.0 | ||
| 008 | 100621s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aFISCHHOFF, Baruch _916645 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMutually assured support : _ba security doctrine for terrorism nuclear weapon threats |
| 260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJuly 2008 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aIf the United States were subject to a terrorist nuclear attack, its president would face overwhelming political pressure to respond decisively. A well-prepared response could help both to prevent additional attacks and to bring the perpetrators to justice. An instinctive response could be cataclysmically ineffective, inflicting enormous collateral damage without achieving either deterrence or justice. An international security doctrine of Mutually Assured Support can make the response to such attacks more effective as well as less likelyby requiring preparations that reduce the threat. The doctrine requires all subscribing nations to mobilize fully in support of the attacked nation, in return for a promise of nonretaliation. It provides a vehicle for domestic and international leadership, allowing the president to engage the American people, from a position of strength, around an issue that has had little public discussion. The authors describe its rationale, implications, and implementation. | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aATRAN, Scot _941239 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSAGEMAN, Marc _941240 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science _g618, p. 160-167 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2008 _xISSN 00027162 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20100621 _b1121^b _cDaiane |
||
| 998 |
_a20100624 _b1012^b _cCarolina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34483 _d34483 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||