000			01577naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0062211355237
003			OSt
005			20190211173019.0
008			100622s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aOLSSON, Jan _941294
245	1	0	_aDemocracy paradoxes in multi-level governance : _btheorizing on structural fund system research
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cApril 2003
520	3		_aThis article examines the EU structural fund system from a democratic point of view and starts theorizing on the nature of basic democracy problems. The analysis is guided by a parliamentary, a pluralistic and an lite-democratic model. None of these models seems to fit well with how the system works in practice, summarized as top-down and technocratic with important vertical co-ordination between administrative levels, which tends to marginalize the role of democratic institutions. Five types of fundamental problem are identified and analysed in terms of democracy paradoxes (multi-level, vertical, economic, horizontal, multi-demos). It is difficult to dissolve these paradoxes because they reflect existing structural fund institutions. In order to democratize, they need to be challenged, either by regulating partnerships in a more democratic way or by challenging the partnership principle with the parliamentary principle.
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g10, 2, p. 283-300 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, April 2003 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100622 _b1135^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100623 _b1707^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34562 _d34562
041			_aeng